Please install Flash Player to view this content.
  User ID :
 
  Password :
 
 
Forgot password
  Skip Navigation Links
 








Article 23 Legislation


HKJA Condemns Government's Refusal to Defer National Security Bill


HKJA Condemns Government's Refusal to Defer National Security Bill
Urges Wide-ranging Review of Provisions



 The Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) is deeply disappointed that the government, in refusing to defer the final vote on the National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill, has refused to listen to the voices of more than half a million Hong Kong people in the July 1st march from Victoria Park to the Central Government Offices.
 
The HKJA condemns the government’s decision to proceed to a vote in the coming week. We urge the government to reconsider its stance on this vital issue, and call on legislators to support calls for deferment, so that the government may carry out a wide-ranging review of the provisions of the bill.
 
We note the changes that the government has proposed, namely the inclusion of a public interest defence in the Official Secrets Ordinance, the scrapping of powers which would allow the police to carry out search and seizure operations without a court warrant, and the deletion of the proposed proscription of Hong Kong organizations.
 
The HKJA believes these changes are far from adequate for the proper protection of freedom of expression and media freedoms. If the government proceeds with its plans to move to a final vote next week, we call on it to take the following actions:
 
1)      Delete the sections on sedition and handling of seditious publications, which pose
the greatest threat to media freedoms. At the very least, it should incorporate all elements of principle 6 of the Johannesburg Principles and impose a six-month time limit on prosecutions.
2)      Scrap the new offences in the Official Secrets Ordinance, or at the very least include proper public interest and prior publication defences. The public interest defence should be worded in the following terms: “It shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under this Ordinance to prove that the disclosure or retention of the information, document or other article was in the public interest.”
 
The HKJA fears that if the government fails to delete offending articles and adopt adequate safeguards, the media and other freedom of expression practitioners would face grave dangers which would ultimately endanger the public’s right to know and Hong Kong's aspiration to become a regional media hub and world city.

HKJA Executive Committee
July 5th 2003
05/07/2003 16:26   updated more
Previous: HKJA Cautiosuly Welcomed the Withdrawal of National Security Bill
Next: HKJA's Submission on the National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill

 

  

Powered by   
 
 


Judgement (19-08-2015)

 

HKJA's Facebook Page

   
  HKJA_47th_pdf
   
  2013 Annual Rpeort
 

2016 Annual Report: One Country Two Nightmares 

[ Press Release ] [ All years ]

   
  2009 Human Rights Press Awards
  The20th Human Rights Press Awards [Details]
   
  China News reporters Harassment Form
  Online Questionaire for China news reporters on harassment at work"
..... [
Online] / [Paper Form]
   
  17th Consumer Right Press Awards
  "17th Consumer Right Press Awards "  
   

 

HKJA's Publication: "The Journalist"
 

A publication provides updated news about HKJA and media industry.. [ Details ]

FEBRUARY 2016 ISSUE

   
  Subscription to "People will not forget"
  "People will not forget" - A HKJA's Publication for the June 4 Incident
Online Version .. [ Detail ]
Subscription .. [ Detail ]
   
  Kevin Lau Incident Concern Group
   
   

 

 
Other Publications
  Reporter Manual in China
 
More